Driving my wife’s car today, I listened to a good deal of talk radio, and my brain is feeling the squeeze. Sean Hannity was discussing the UAE port deal with Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and the discussion was something I hadn’t experienced in right-wing talk in a long time. Both agreed that the simple argument that one private corporation from the UK cannot be compared with one run by a Middle East dictatorship. Bush’s primary defense has been to label those who oppose the deal as being racist against Arabs, and as far as he’s concerned, every bit of data we have available to compare the UK and UAE in terms of freedom of the press, civil rights, etc. don’t apply. Basically his position ignores the fact that the United Arab Emirates is a country that posts a lowest possible score when it comes to human rights, as well as the fact that it’s government has supported Osama Bin Laden and Al Quada. Looked at side by side with his “you’re either with us or against us” statement regarding the War on Terror, there’s absolutely no spin imaginable that could square his position with reality. Sean Hannity of all people believes in what I’ve just written here 100%, and said so over the radio about fifteen minutes ago.
That said, his criticism of the deal is characterized politically as a mistake based on having not brought more people into the discussion beforehand. The mistake basically being that the negotiations were done out of the public’s view, and that dissenting points of view were ignored along the way. Nevermind the fact that Bush-Cheney have made every single critical decision since gaining power in this same exact way, in Hannity’s opinion, the fact that Democrats are politicizing this deal is what he’s most angry about.
Think about that for a second now. His position, as well as many on the right-wing, is that the deal should not go through and that the President is wrong, yet somehow it’s equally wrong for the minority party to use it for political gain? What are Democrats supposed to be doing? They disagree with the policy, voice their dissent, are agreed with by almost everyone on the other side of the aisle, but shouldn’t gain any political points at the same time?
Alright, I’m talking about someone as partisan as they come, but how can anyone rationally disagree with this decision and not walk away from it questioning:
- Where President Bush’s loyalty lies, with the people or his business associates
- How serious Bush really is about spreading freedom and democracy, with it being so easy to overlook an ally’s human rights abuses
- How many other decisions have be made based on similar values, like have been exposed here
You can’t have it both ways. Politically you either have to support this deal for the sake of the President, who you truly believe in – OR – disagree and accept the fact that political ground is going to be lost because of it.
Because the larger issue here has nothing to do with ports or security, but the idea that a corporation is somehow a higher entity than a government. In Iraq the conservative vision has been put in place, with a 15% flat tax and an idea that the Iraqi citizens should not look towards government for services and protection, but instead to the coporations that operate within their communities. That being the case, electricity cannot be counted on consistently for more than 8-12 hours a day in some areas, drinking water is not widely available and the corporations that were supposed to fill in these gaps are acting consistently with what we all understand to be a corporation’s nature…to make money! Not the fault of these business entities that they were assumed to have the ability or desire to provide what a government should, the very concept of what a government should and should not provide it’s people is the issue here.
So of course a third world dictatorship with a horrible human rights record is seen with the President’s eyes as entirely seperate from the corporation they own and operate. It’s the ideology that’s been bought into by the right-wing of our country for decades now. Read More

