I’ve never been impressed by Reid, and him being the senate majority leader at this stage has been annoying me for some time now. Dick Durbin is a better fit for that role, but I’d still rather see someone like Chuck Schumer or Barbara Boxer in Reid’s position. Aside from his shady business deals from back home, he’s proven to be ineffective in getting things done on Iraq. Too much time has already been wasted trying to get this Iraq debate on CSPAN, and now that it finally is, I’m nervous about a lot of things like message discipline and whether or not the two houses are close enough to get something that can be even close to veto-proof. Obviously the house is going to be too far one way for the senate, but if that gap isn’t closed with a consistent message of why, one that makes sense to Democrats, I blame Reid for that.
Incoherence defines much of what the house has proposed regarding Iraq, having been properly panned by Jon Stewart, and it is the role of the senate majority leader to smooth this out. You’re talking about a house caucus numbering over 200, and unless the brains of half or more are shut down with fear, ala the GOP under Delay’s leadership, the final product on a bill dealing with something as complex as Iraq will be as confusing as what Nancy Pelosi laid out the other day. The senate on the other hand is not as much of a cluster, and with senators like Chuck Hagel, John Warner, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins saying the things they are saying so often now, it shouldn’t be this difficult for the majority leader to get something done.
If he is unable to get house leaders to back down on certain elements of their legislation, then he’s the wrong person for the job. If he is unable to figure out a way to leverage the most anti-war and election-conscious (Norm Coleman) Republicans to his advantage by now, then he’s the wrong person for the job. The right politician in this situation would be able to get something done. The once-in-a-generation politician in this situation would be able to pass a bill with enough votes to override a veto.
Posted by Al Swearengen in Words
