Suicide Prevention (Rerun)

(Since I’m devoting all of my writing energy to a project that cannot be shared publicly, I’ll be reruning some old ones and trying to post some more heady reading material from elsewhere along the way. Original posting)

US Foreign PolicyThe US military just can’t help themselves when it comes to troops being killed. They lied about Pat Tillman’s death, and here’s another example: Contrary to U.S. military statements, four U.S. soldiers did not die repelling a sneak attack at the governor’s office in the Shiite holy city of Karbala last week. New information obtained by The Associated Press shows they were abducted and found dead or dying as far as 25 miles away. Perhaps it’s out of shame or embarassment, but there is something that plays into this urge to supress the truth rather than deal with what these events actually mean. Is it so unbelievable that our enemy could kidnap four of our soldiers, drive away, kill them and never be caught? Or is that fact something we can live with, as long as the public doesn’t hear about it? I think the latter is right on, and the sad truth is that any number of US soldiers could be kidnaped, killed and then dumped on the side of the road like these four were, and to the bosses it wouldn’t cause anything a swig of peptol bismol wouldn’t fix.

Dick Cheney would respond to it like this, “Oh yea? Well you can tell the group responsible for this that they can kidnap and kill whoever they want, because we’re not leaving!” To some people that sounds like evidence of strength, but to me it’s just further proof that these troops that die at this point in the war really represent nothing more than the cost of doing business. Their deaths are something we as a society, along with the majority of our government, pretend to care about in the same way that we pretend to care about people who got cancer because their water was contaminated by a company’s pollution. Truth of the matter is, as a whole we simply shrug it off and go on with our day. Of course, it would be crazy if Dick Cheney were to respond to an entire family with leukemia and breast cancer by saying, “You can kill this family and every other family on this block…you hear me chemicals? Go ahead and kill these kids, we humans aren’t going anywhere!”

The logical response would be to find out how to keep from poluting the drinking water, but people like the ones we have calling the shots at the moment don’t think on that level at all. In terms of their role as the protectors of the republic, they protect entities rather than people. The entities they protect will in turn take care of the people, so there’s nothing they have to worry about along those lines. So a problem with education or lack of health care or work can be fixed in a number of ways, and the prefered method is to have the military fighting a war at all times. It creates work on the back end as equipment and weapons are needed, and for society’s dead-enders and/or the fools who really believe in the concept of killing Arabs halfways across the world to protect their neighbor living in the suburbs of Phoenix, the front line is a good place to deposit most of what the government would have had to pay for during your life anyhow.

When you run the numbers, it’s certainly not as simple a business model as say, systematically raising the niccotene level in cigarettes, but with the ability to continue grinding up bodies and equipment, expending rounds of ammo at the pace we are without any power within government willing to put an end to it, the promise of continuous orders for vehicles, uniforms, weapons, body armor, etc. and the subsequent lifelong need for medication, therapy, surgery, medical equipment, etc. for the veterans…our private sector then finds itself flush with opportunities to ramp up production, spread some stock options around, and takeover the operations of its competition. Once these businesses are given enough time to consolidate, the price per item cost will lower, and even more money can be made.

The key ingredient of course is human bodies that can pull the trigger and be maimed and/or killed in the war. As long as there are troops wearing uniforms, the public can be told of their absolute heroism and how they’re our best and brightest, with the story line that the war is what allows you and I to have our freedom. A universal farce that works like a charm, as regardless of the circumstances of the war in question, the soldier is to be compared with those who defeated Germany and the Brittish, and any indication to the contrary, like evidence that the troops are not only far from our “best and brightest” but that they are also apt to exhibit behavior common amongst the uneducated thugery of inner city ghetos throughout the homeland, is sure to be confronted with a thunderous wave of condemnation that is so exact and overwhelming in it’s force, that whoever was making their living by providing commentary prior to that moment, will most likely never have the opportunity to do so afterwards.

This video (Iraqi soldiers beating detainees while US troops cheer) brought me back to a time I remember quite well, as it began for me not even a decade ago. You’re in a humvee with your fellow soldiers, part of a combat unit and what takes place inside our “hearts and minds” would never make it past network censors, let alone the level of decency that exists within most communities around the world. In fact if you were to pluck out a handfull of trained killers from any line unit in theatre today, and put them in front of an auditorium full of kids in the frame of mind they’re in on a daily basis, those kids would most likely be scarred for life, and if the birds-and-the-bees discussion had yet to take place, it would have to start that night at home in an uncomfortable way like, “Mommy, does your snatch smell like salmon or clam chowder?”

Hence the reason for officers and medals, as the face of this organization cannot include any of these people and still be taken seriously by the general public. That they’re heralded as something just below demigod within our media and the underlying culture is proof that there is in general, a very good business reason for highlighting the legend and ignoring most everything else. Which doesn’t explain why the military can’t just admit that four soldiers were overtaken by twice as many of the enemy, and driven away with before anyone even noticed they were gone. Perhaps this type of lie has more to do with the career of a few officers than anything else, as I’m sure the platoon leader and company commander of the unit those soldiers belonged to are kissing their careers bye-bye. Though how can you blame anyone for anything at this point? Afterall, Rumsfeld did say, “stuff happens”!

It’s a cost of doing business. Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to get in touch with my broker.

Update: Another video you need to watch – CBS News Report on the effort to secure a single street within Baghdad.

Blackwater Bullies The Army

rambo(Larry Kaplow, Rod Nordland, Mark Hosenball and Michael Hastings – Newsweek) The colonel was furious. “Can you believe it? They actually drew their weapons on U.S. soldiers.” He was describing a 2006 car accident, in which an SUV full of Blackwater operatives had crashed into a U.S. Army Humvee on a street in Baghdad’s Green Zone. The colonel, who was involved in a follow-up investigation and spoke on the condition he not be named, said the Blackwater guards disarmed the U.S. Army soldiers and made them lie on the ground at gunpoint until they could disentangle the SUV. His account was confirmed by the head of another private security company…Unlike nearly everyone else who enters the Green Zone, said an American soldier who guards a gate, Blackwater gunmen refuse to stop and clear their weapons of live ammunition once inside. One military contractor, who spoke anonymously for fear of retribution in his industry, recounted the story of a Blackwater operative who answered a Marine officer’s order to put his pistol on safety when entering a base post office by saying, “This is my safety,” and wiggling his trigger finger in the air. “Their attitude was, ‘We’re f—ing security; we don’t have to answer to anybody’.”

Nice…the free market in action over in Iraq. Alan Greenspan and Ayn Rand’s cadaver nod in approval.

A U.S. Embassy staffer, who did not have permission to speak on the record, said, “It’s a few bad eggs that seem to be spoiling the bunch.”

Why does that excuse sound so familiar?

22,000 US Soldiers Denied Healthcare

(from DailyKOS) “The Pentagon has informed thousands of American soldiers in Iraq that their Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder was a pre-existing condition from before they ever joined the military. In other words, NO TREATMENT, NO INSURANCE, NO NOTHING!

More than 22,000 soldiers serving in Iraq have been kicked out of the US military entirely – booted from a war zone straight to the streets – for seeking treatment for the psychological effects of combat and brain injuries. Now, they’re jobless, without medical coverage, and in immediate need of medical treatment that Bush’s Pentagon/VA absolutely refuses to provide.”

Hersh: The Strategy to SELL a war with Iran

From Think Progress

You can sell [this approach]. It’s more logical. You can say to people, the American people, we’re only hitting those people that we think are trying to hit our boys and the coalition forces. And so that seems to be more sensible. Because the White House thinks they can actually pitch this, this would actually work. In other words, you can do a bombing and not have the world scream at us and also get the British on board.

During a secure videoconference that took place early this summer, the President told Ryan Crocker, the U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, that he was thinking of hitting Iranian targets across the border and that the British “were on board.” At that point, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice interjected that there was a need to proceed carefully, because of the ongoing diplomatic track. Bush ended by instructing Crocker to tell Iran to stop interfering in Iraq or it would face American retribution. (Al: Condoleezza Rice isn’t affecting anything here, just as she failed to affect anything significant during the Iraq war. If Bush is suddenly convinced that it is time to do something, if history is any indication of what will happen, she will turn into a bobblehead, and leak dissent here and there to the papers. It won’t be voiced emphatically during the run-up, and whatever mistakes are made, she will take on the task of defending the President and laying blame on people who don’t deserve it…ala George Tenet and the 16 words on uranium that appeared in Bush’s state of the union speech in 2003.)

The White House has even prepared a “Clinton did it too” defense for attacking Iran, according to Hersh. “If Democrats objected, the Administration could say, “Bill Clinton did the same thing; he conducted limited strikes in Afghanistan, the Sudan, and in Baghdad to protect American lives.”

The Iran War

This is its genesis right here – text of an amendment to the defense authorization bill (note that paragraphs 3 and 4 were removed from the final version, and 5 remained):

(1) that the manner in which the United States transitions and structures its military presence in Iraq will have critical long-term consequences for the future of the Persian Gulf and the Middle East, in particular with regard to the capability of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to pose a threat to the security of the region, the prospects for democracy for the people of the region, and the health of the global economy;

(2) that it is a vital national interest of the United States to prevent the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran from turning Shi’a militia extremists in Iraq into a Hezbollah-like force that could serve its interests inside Iraq, including by overwhelming, subverting, or co-opting institutions of the legitimate Government of Iraq;

(3) that it should be the policy of the United States to combat, contain, and roll back the violent activities and destabilizing influence inside Iraq of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, its foreign facilitators such as Lebanese Hezbollah, and its indigenous Iraqi proxies;

(4) to support the prudent and calibrated use of all instruments of United States national power in Iraq, including diplomatic, economic, intelligence, and military instruments, in support of the policy described in paragraph (3) with respect to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its proxies;

(5) that the United States should designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as a foreign terrorist organization under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act and place the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps on the list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists, as established under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and initiated under Executive Order 13224; and

(6) that the Department of the Treasury should act with all possible expediency to complete the listing of those entities targeted under United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1737 and 1747 adopted unanimously on December 23, 2006 and March 24, 2007, respectively.

Paragraph number 5 cracked the door open, and far too many Senators remain naive as to what this President can and will do with an inch. If Iran’s national military is a terrorist organization, then they’ll reason an attack is authorized based on the President’s war powers in fighting the global war on terror. If Iran’s military is a terrorist organization according to the US Congress, then there’s nothing left to discuss. There doesn’t need to be WMDs. The nuke reasons aren’t necessary once this thing passes.

Cute little buggers that they are, the Democrats attached the Hate Crimes bill to this defense authorization, and so, the blood of foreigners will be traded in exchange for legislation that has no business being a part of it, ala the minimum wage increase tacked onto the last war spending bill this past spring. I could go on forever on this, but one example of why I’ve been depressed this week is Dick Durbin, who speaks harshly about the amendment and then 12 hours later votes in favor of it. Is he on drugs? Are any of these fucks paying attention? I suppose I have less to complain about than others, as Kerry and Kennedy both voted against the amendment, though it does seem silly for a Lieberman/Kyl amendment on Iran to get an up or down vote on the floor, yet Webb’s amendment couldn’t break the filibuster. How does that make sense? Republicans get their votes on this and the bullshit MoveOn amendment, but an amendment to give troops equal time home as time deployed can’t make it to the floor? Will it ever be time to say enough’s enough and shut the place down?

Harry Reid is a chump, Dianne Feinstein is a disgrace and Hillary Clinton just lost my vote forever. Carl Levin…he can be talked into anything. “My good friend, you say you want to work on a bipartisan amendment to outlaw breathing…hmm, Bi-Partisan ey?” Click here to see the roll call, 76-22.

Support the Troops, Screw the Veterans

This war is becoming more difficult to support in a romantic sense as the bloody months continue to pile up.  What interests me most about true believers today, is that besides the token blather points – “Anbar now has casual Friday and a soft serve ice cream machine on every corner” or “I talked to someone who is over there, and they say that the war is going well” – there is still only that romantic outlook of how democracy can still be a good thing, even if half of the population has to die before it can enjoy its freedom to vote for government officials.  To hear them say it, you’d think that every democracy in the world was doing well, operating openly and adhering to the will of its people.  When the truth is, as long as the water is running, the electricity is up and there’s a job to pay the bills, most people don’t give shit about all the rest.  It’s not that important when the alternative is possibly being doused with kerosene and set on fire, or having to move the family to a shantytown in Syria without a cent to your name…militia squatters have destroyed your collection of artwork, stolen your stash of pornography and used your bathtub as a toilet…you know it’s true, but all that can be replaced, repaired, remembered, as these American fellows seem quite optomistic about things, so I tell the wife and children that they will only have to turn tricks for a few more months and then we’ll be able to go back home. 

No…these people are a very inconvenient reality for the true believer, and they are not featured as part of the romantic bullshit story of freedom, liberty and democracy.  Neither are the veterans, nor the fact that IEDs kill more of our people than any other method of attack, nor the fact that Iraq is in the midst of a civil war.  Take out all of these elements and you’re close to the story they’ll tell you, but not there yet.  Since the political party that handled this from the start is still in power, and happens to be the party that the true believer votes for, they are likely to sprinkle in a whole lot of blame for why the war has failed.  It’s easy to point fingers at various nations full of brown people and accuse them of interfering with our occupation, so Iran, Syria and every other Arab nation besides Saudi Arabia, Israel and Jordan will be talked about, blamed for our own mistakes. 

This is a tough thing to have to do, basically turn the brain off and revert back to the animal instincts.  If necessary, eat your own.  Veterans have it tough already, but now the true believers want us to know that they’re sick and tired of hearing about things they’d rather ignore.  They’re offended that people who served in the military would have the audacity to lay claim to their woobie, their security blanket, this myth that somehow the right-wingers are the only patriotic Americans, and so the veterans speak, their families speak, the true believers want to smear them like they do every other political opponent, only it’s tabboo…or it used to be before these people lost their minds.  Two pieces of evidence here, and the second is a video of someone I’m friends with online.  The first is something written by a veteran in response to something Rush Limbaugh said:

1.   So I’m a “Phony Soldier,” Rush? w/update

2. Wife of a veteran told she should ‘cease to exist’ by a right-wing professor at a Vets for Freedom event

The Webb Amendment

Jim Webb is one hell of a leader, and this time around, Repubicans are going to have a tough time claiming to care about the troops if they filibuster. This bill would give the troops equal recovery time to how long they’re at war. Otherwise, a soldier could finish up a 15 month tour in Iraq, change units and end up back there in 6 months. That’s what’s happening now. The stop loss policy was largely ignored for too many years, but come Wednesday (big day on CSPAN!) that could finally change. Secretary of Defense Gates was pre-empting this amendment on the talk shows this past Sunday, arguing against it. “The Price of Loyalty”…indeed.

Supposedly this guy was going to be an honest broker, but here he’s blocking for the sake of Lil’ Bush not having to end the war before he’s out of office. Here’s Webb’s one minute clip explaining the amendment.

Update: Here’s the news from today, no surprise – GOP opposes bill regulating combat tours

Chuck Hagel on Petraeus/War Policy

I’ve been trying to rip Hagel’s speech and questions to Petraeus and Crocker at last week’s day 2 hearing from CSPAN’s website, but my computer is barely a step up from an abacus, so every time I try, only the first 25 seconds is produced. On this score, the blogsphere hasn’t been all its cracked up to be…the community shit the bed here, as Hagel’s speech is nowhere to be found, yet those of about 10 other senators were. I don’t know if it’s because he’s a Republican or what, but he stole the show as far as I could tell, and that fact became even more obvious upon a review of that hearing on CSPAN’s website that night. It really sucks that his words weren’t given the time they deserved in the corporate news or on radio, but it sucks even more that there wasn’t a youtube up of it. That’s pathetic. As a consolation, here’s his interview on Bill Maher’s show this weekend.

Walter Cronkite after the Tet Offensive, 1968

h/t to Blue Gal over at Crooks and Liars

Army of Dude, Back Home

I know that some of you have bookmarked the ‘Army of Dude‘ blog, and I wanted to pass along that he’s done with the 15 months in Iraq.  His father posted a comment saying he’s home safe and sound.  If you haven’t yet read any of his work, get over there and check it out.  Great writing and of course, a first hand account of what’s what in Iraq. 

The Rundown 9/12/07

General Petraeus has a boss, CENTCOM Commander Admiral William Fallon, and he told his subordinate in March that, “[Petraeus, you're] an ass-kissing little chickenshit. I hate people like that.” ~~ Two suicide bombings that killed (at least) 50 people in Algeria last weekend were carried out by the North Africa wing of al-Qaeda. ~~ Senator Obama (campaign speech): “I opposed this war from the beginning. I opposed the war in 2002. I opposed it in 2003. I opposed it in 2004. I opposed it in 2005. I opposed it in 2006. I introduced a plan in January to remove all of our combat brigades by next March. And I am here to say that we have to begin to end this war now.” ~~ Since 2001, health insurance premiums for US families are up 78%. ~~ In pill-popping news, a study based on data from a National Center for Health Statistics survey discovered that, “the number of American children and adolescents treated for bipolar disorder increased 4000% from 1994-2003.” ~~ “The Department of Justice’s Voting Section is pressuring 10 states to purge voter rolls before the 2008 election based on statistics that former Voting Section attorneys and other experts say are flawed and do not confirm that those states have more voter registrations than eligible voters, as the department alleges.” ~~ A study showed that in 38 states, “conservative columns reach more readers in total than progressive columns.” ~~ And finally, for all those folks who like to complain about ‘liberal academia’ – Erwin Chemerinsky (Legal Affairs magazine named him one of the ‘top 20 legal thinkers in America’ in 2005), hired as the dean of a new law school at the University of California at Irvine a week ago, and has now been fired by the chancellor because, “he had not been aware of how Chemerinsky’s political views would make him a target for criticism from conservatives”; Chemerinsky replies, “I’m angry because I don’t believe anyone liberal or conservative should be denied a position like this because of political views.”

Petraeus the Magnificent – Day One Review

The books are cooked, and Petraeus is going to be looking bad once this week is through. He’ll attempt to babble through his inquisitor’s time in the next two days, but it will only get tougher tomorrow. I watched a good chunk of the hearing today, and what stood out more than anything, was the Republican members either using their time to talk about how Islamofascism is the enemy in Iraq, how MoveOn.org clowned on their Petraeus love-fest (considered below the belt, and of course, their first concern is the reputation of the general…with that in mind, has anyone ever heard of a selfish Republican?), and/or their finest memory of when they met the general in Iraq, what they ate that day, how many neat-o military things they saw, the number of t-shirts they brought back with them, etc. Rep. Lantos steals the show in my opinion, if you only watch one clip, make sure it’s this first one!

Chairman Tom Lantos of the Foreign Affairs Committee gives opening remarks:

John Rove:When did it become patrioticly incorrect to speak the truth?

General Petraeus is a lying sack of excrement; Moveon.org has the facts here, http://pol.moveon.org/petraeus.html. Right wing pundits don’t even seem to care that he is lying but they seem to spend a lot of time whining that someone had to nerve to question their latest hero. In a time of war, especially when that war is going badly, the truth should be more important than the image of a general who is obviously not getting the job done.

Petraeus Stands By Disputed 2004 Op-Ed (I remember reading this, and in hindsight, it was a crock of shit and he knows it. Just like his stats and most of what else he has to say about the fact that he’s a whore for a draft-dodging rich kid whose used up people like him since the day he took office.)

Reps. Jan Schakowsky and Lloyd Doggett discussed the White House’s reporting this morning on the House floor:

Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) didn’t have much success in getting Gen. Petraeus to go into more detail about how he’s derived his statistics for civilian casualties and sectarian attacks.

Petraeus the Magnificent

In the United States, as opposed to Pakistan or some banana republic south of Texas, the military is told what to do by civilians, and that dynamic alone, established well before wars in Korea and Iraq could have been imagined, has kept this form of government legitimate throughout several quagmires like the one we’re in now. The reasons for setting it up like this are many, but whoever’s not acquainted with the concept, read up on Rome and how Caesar came to power. By their very nature, warriors are accustomed to getting their own way, and unless there’s enough muscle within the capital to keep it from happening, the military so cherished today, can and will cut off a government’s head for the sake of winning an argument tomorrow.

When I hear about General Petraeus, as Republicans tell it, the guy is definitely the first officer to have a clue of what he’s doing over in Iraq, and when he speaks, it’s like being one of those people who were lucky enough to see John Lennon sing before he was murdered. So saith Petraeus, on right-wing radio, satellite feeds and scribbled inside the Trapper Keepers of all these pathetic clowns calling themselves Republicans today. The emperor having been naked for a couple years, is now content to fondle himself until 2009, these cowards are literally lining up for a chance to shine this General’s shoes. How far we’ve fallen, when the party of Eisenhower turns into this, a group of confused cyborgs yearning to be taken advantage of by a strong, authoritative man wearing a uniform.

Now there was a President who was hip to the flip, and well understood the fact that if you allowed a military general to waltz into DC with the type of clout being handed to Patraeus, it was like hiring junkies to run methadone clinics. Indeed, you’ll inspect the place one day and half the employees aren’t well enough to work, half of the drugs have gone missing, the paperwork is impossible to decipher and the one in charge is telling you to take it easy, calm down, it’s not that bad. What else would they tell you? The recent headline said that Patraeus might be able to let go of 4,000 troops by next spring.

So the question now is, whether or not there are some Democrats who are prepared to put this guy in his place. I doubt there are, but I am holding out hope for Russ Feingold or Chuck Hagel to rise above the middle-management funk crippling the Senate so far in 2007. Carl Levin and Harry Reid are perfect examples, a couple of guys who would definitely buy timeshares from Shelly Levine. Tweedle-dumbfuck and tweedle-dumberfuck, blocking for all their “good friends” who decided to run for President, like this is a student council meeting over when to hold the bake sale. The whole situation is to history what diarea is to a toilet bowl.

What’s left is Petraeus himself, a wanna-be cut from the same cloth as Peter Pace. Never able to appreciate that while given a whole lot of lip service by the President, it’s still a situation where too much has to be done with not enough, just like it was from the start. A ridiculous war put on the credit card by a handful of stupid people, all of whom Petraeus voluntarily covers for, lies for. In fact, the only people who understand the role of a General are occupying the White House, and it shows. Watch this idiot take one for the team he’ll never be a part of next week, at the expense of a team he actually does belong to! You know, that Army we used to have.

An Inconvenient Truth

by Andrew Cockburn – published in The Nation magazine (excerpts):

In September 2003, Secretary of State Colin Powell descended on the town to inaugurate a newly completed museum commemorating the 5,000 victims, making emotional reference to the “choking mothers [who] died holding their choking babies to their chests.” Inside, tasteful displays featured dioramas of huddled corpses and other evocative memorabilia, including the empty casings of mustard and nerve gas bombs now painted up in bright colors…Saddam never lacked for partners. He had launched his original ill-fated attack on Iran in September 1980 after garnering an indirect endorsement from Washington via the Saudis. The best the UN Security Council could do in the face of this act of unprovoked aggression was to issue a statement appealing to both parties to “desist from all armed activity.” Two years later, US official complacency was jarred by the unexpected revival of Iranian military fortunes and consequent Iraqi retreats. As a result, for the rest of the war US policy was geared toward preventing an Iraqi defeat by any means necessary.

Iraq first resorted to chemical weapons in the mountains of the Kurdish north. In July 1983, the Iranians attacked at Haj Omran, a strategic mountain pass in the far northeast of Iraq. In a telling example of the ethnic and political complexities of that part of the world, the attacking force included elements of the Badr Corps, Iraqi Shiite prisoners recruited from POW camps, along with anti-Saddam Kurds from the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Masoud Barzani. Opposing this force were units of other Iraqi Kurds from the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), headed by Jalal Talabani, who between 1983 and 1984 was allied with Saddam against the Iranians. The attackers were initially successful, until Iraqi planes swooped overhead and dropped bombs. Fighters in the area suddenly smelled garlic and soon afterward developed breathing problems and skin lesions, symptoms that inexorably spread to those lower on the mountain as the gas–sulphur mustard developed during World War I–drifted downhill…

To convince the Iraqi leader that we really were his friends, the Administration dispatched the President’s Special Middle East Envoy, Donald Rumsfeld, bearing a gift for Saddam from Reagan: a pair of golden spurs. In much of the Middle East, Rumsfeld was an unpopular figure–the US Ambassador in Damascus would leave town, after locking up the liquor cabinet in the residence, whenever he heard the envoy was on his way. But Rummy was popular in Baghdad, where Saddam’s men enthused that they regarded him as “a good listener” and “liked him as a person.” Rumsfeld did not spoil the party by giving chemical weapons more than a passing mention; instead he spent much of his private time with Saddam trying to sell his host on the idea of an Iraqi oil pipeline to Israel.

The following March, when news of Iraq’s revival of poison gas as a weapon finally surfaced in the press, the State Department condemned “the prohibited use of chemical weapons wherever it occurs,” while Rumsfeld was sent back to Baghdad to pass the word that the condemnation had been essentially pro forma and that the American desire to improve relations “at a pace of Iraq’s choosing remain[s] undiminished.” Meanwhile, US diplomats worked to quash discussion of the issue at international forums. No wonder Saddam exulted later that year over what he called “the beautiful atmosphere between us.” The “beautiful atmosphere” soured for a period when it emerged that the United States had been simultaneously selling arms to Iran…

The memorial inaugurated by Powell six months after the invasion was a priority project for Kurdish officials, built, so locals concluded, for the benefit of visiting dignitaries who came to view the exhibit and grieve accordingly. Halabjans, chafing at their neglect by their supposed representatives, were not impressed. On March 16, 2006, the eighteenth anniversary of the attack, they marched to the building and torched it. “Many delegations went to that monument,” one of the locals was quoted as saying. “They were paying a visit to the dead people, but neglecting the living.”

We listen to our generals, until we don’t

Seems like a lot of military types are not feeling the surge.  The real test will be whether decision makers in the Bush administration listen to people with experience or continue to weaken the US military by pursuing the Iraq debacle 

(LATimes-8/24/07) WASHINGTON — The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is expected to advise President Bush to reduce the U.S. force in Iraq next year by almost half, potentially creating a rift with top White House officials and other military commanders over the course of the war.

Administration and military officials say Marine Gen. Peter Pace is likely to convey concerns by the Joint Chiefs that keeping well in excess of 100,000 troops in Iraq through 2008 will severely strain the military. This assessment could collide with one being prepared by the U.S. commander in Iraq, Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, calling for the U.S. to maintain higher troop levels for 2008 and beyond.

Peter Pace’s New Ride

Peter Pace

The War (Pithy Pre-September Position)

The security situation is improved on each piece of ground directly beneath our soldiers’ feet. Put these soldiers in vehicles, and the IED explosions argue against this theory. Our forces exit an area, and what happens then? The security situation reverts back to what it was prior to our surge of bodies into it. Insurgents, as often as they may incorrectly be described as puppets under the control of outside forces, are the Iraqis themselves. An obviously illegitimate, and hastily established national government has for the most part dissolved, while one level down, back-to-back assassinations of regional governors signal a grim reality, that the political situation will have to be built from the bottom up to exist with any authority or legitimacy.

Iraq’s Prime Minister has visited Iran, and has invited the Iranian President to Iraq. Just as we supplied arms to both sides in the Iran-Iraq war, and to Afghani insurgents in their fight against a Soviet occupying force, other nations in the world are doing the exact same thing, as the oil siphoned off and stolen each month since the invasion by insurgents provides ample trade value for whatever is needed. The events in Iraq are driving the situation, regardless of US policy. We are simply along for the ride at this point. In the year 2007 Iraq has destabilized politically, with both Sunni and al-Sadr’s Shiite blocs essentially pulling out of the federal government altogether, thereby rendering every single piece of legislation needing to be passed an impossibility.

This will never get better for us. On our account the Iraqis will not do a single thing from now until we finally leave. An intellectually dishonest attempt by someone, to trump up the significance of peace in a neighborhood or city that our troops currently have on lock-down, is the only example I’ve heard over the past several weeks to explain why we are now on a path towards victory. “The surge is working”, they say. In Baghdad? In any areas where our troops are not currently a presence, is there peace and safety in Iraq today? There is not. Students of history, military history especially, must recognize our position in Iraq today, and realize it is an exact replica of the French occupations of Vietnam and Algeria, as well as our own occupation of Vietnam. Anyone who doesn’t at this point is choosing faith over reason, and in time, will find themselves on the wrong side of history. Perhaps even then, arguing against something as certain as gravity.

Iraq Vets talk about killing civilians

Marines Killing Unarmed Civilians

IED montage (Turn down the volume on your speakers)

The War as We Saw It

Buddhika Jayamaha is an Army specialist. Wesley D. Smith is a sergeant. Jeremy Roebuck is a sergeant. Omar Mora is a sergeant. Edward Sandmeier is a sergeant. Yance T. Gray is a staff sergeant. Jeremy A. Murphy is a staff sergeant.

VIEWED from Iraq at the tail end of a 15-month deployment, the political debate in Washington is indeed surreal. Counterinsurgency is, by definition, a competition between insurgents and counterinsurgents for the control and support of a population. To believe that Americans, with an occupying force that long ago outlived its reluctant welcome, can win over a recalcitrant local population and win this counterinsurgency is far-fetched. As responsible infantrymen and noncommissioned officers with the 82nd Airborne Division soon heading back home, we are skeptical of recent press coverage portraying the conflict as increasingly manageable and feel it has neglected the mounting civil, political and social unrest we see every day. (Obviously, these are our personal views and should not be seen as official within our chain of command.)

The claim that we are increasingly in control of the battlefields in Iraq is an assessment arrived at through a flawed, American-centered framework. Yes, we are militarily superior, but our successes are offset by failures elsewhere. What soldiers call the “battle space” remains the same, with changes only at the margins. It is crowded with actors who do not fit neatly into boxes: Sunni extremists, Al Qaeda terrorists, Shiite militiamen, criminals and armed tribes. This situation is made more complex by the questionable loyalties and Janus-faced role of the Iraqi police and Iraqi Army, which have been trained and armed at United States taxpayers’ expense.

A few nights ago, for example, we witnessed the death of one American soldier and the critical wounding of two others when a lethal armor-piercing explosive was detonated between an Iraqi Army checkpoint and a police one. Local Iraqis readily testified to American investigators that Iraqi police and Army officers escorted the triggermen and helped plant the bomb. These civilians highlighted their own predicament: had they informed the Americans of the bomb before the incident, the Iraqi Army, the police or the local Shiite militia would have killed their families.

As many grunts will tell you, this is a near-routine event. Reports that a majority of Iraqi Army commanders are now reliable partners can be considered only misleading rhetoric. Read More

Birds of a Feather

  1. Fatigue cripples US army in Iraq

  2. Memo shows [Utah] mine owners already knew they had roof problems in March

  3. Texas girl in [taxpayer funded] ”boot camp” is tied to a van and dragged

  4. Cheney in ’94 on why it would be stupid to occupy Iraq

Maher Arar’s Murderers Are Exposed

torture chamber“With persons likely to be tortured, there’s not even [been] a claim of a cost-benefit analysis. It’s not like you’re torturing to get the ticking bomb. It’s just that we would rather send this person back and have that person face torture than keep them imprisoned in Canada. There’s not even a trade-off there. It seems to me you can only come to a conclusion like that if you don’t accept the person as fully human.”
– University of Toronto law professor Audrey Macklin

As journalism catches up with our most recent history, this turn of events which landed Canadian citizen Maher Arar in a torture chamber in Syria will become more and more familiar. ‘Ethics’ and ‘war’ are certainly two words that have no business being anywhere near one another according to the right-wing hawks out there, but I’ve disagreed with that opinion from the start. When the rules that govern our decision making are eliminated, as they were after 9/11, not only do we lose our legitimacy, but the results we hope to achieve move further out of reach.

A dynamic such as this, will again prompt the hawks to argue an unethical position that must disregard the mistakes as being a ‘cost of doing business’, while blaming someone like me for the fact that the mistakes themselves are what creates the blow back, and that it wouldn’t have mattered if I and others hadn’t shined a light on such things. This is the mindset that always seems to start from a point where the government is infallible, and it is the media outlet that publishes details of what the government has been doing without our knowledge that is to blame. The newspaper isn’t simply doing what a newspaper is there to do, but rather it is purposely trying to kill each and every one of us.

The details behind Maher Arar’s detention, the reason why he was picked up, came up in a hearing a few months ago, with Senator Leahy grilling Gonzo on why it happened, and also how we could justify outsourcing his torture to a country like Syria. (The Murder of Maher Arar – 1/07) I wrote about this exchange and set up a Google Alert for anything pertaining to Arar, but the information needed to figure out how it came to be that the US government had convinced the Canadian government to hand over one of its citizens to be treated in this way, was still bogged down by that tired “harmful to national security” argument, so often a masquerading embarrassment and nothing more. That is absolutely the case here.

A judge in Canada recognized this, and so he did what a US judge hasn’t yet had the guts to do, and that is to reject the argument made by our government that the people have no right to any information, especially embarrassing information like this. He made it public. It has prompted a robust debate in Canada about issues our MSM tends to drown out, like “can we give up our rights so easily for the sake of national security”? Due process is the big one for me, as it has become much too easy for the US government to simply pick and choose who needs to be removed from society without having to prove wrongdoing.

It made our government lazy and arbitrarily brutal. We have bought in to the foolish notion that torture is a legitimate, productive way to extract actionable information from a suspect. Here is my favorite pick of the Canadian media of the past couple days.

That is apparently what happened to Ahmad Abou El Maati, another Canadian who, shortly after Sept. 11, 2001, was tortured by Syrian jailers into making a “confession” about planning a terror-bomb attack in Canada. He fingered Arar as an associate, and that appears to have been enough to make Canadian government agencies discard Arar’s rights like a used tissue.

Need we say that El Maati, once back in Canada, renounced his confession, saying he would have told his jailers anything, and that he apologized for randomly naming Arar? (Canada.com)

No apology from the US government should be expected. I’m sure that the major players involved in making stories like this a reality are convinced of their righteousness. We know that President Bush considers what happened to Maher Arar “God’s Will”.

Is Bush Due for a Colin Blow?

karl writes in an email: “Maybe if Powell comes forward the democrats will get enough courage to end this debacle”

Of all the former Bush administration officials whose advice was ignored — to disastrous effect — in the run-up to the Iraq war, Colin Powell has remained the most stoic and unwilling to criticize what others have called a lack of planning and overall mismanagement that led America to its current predicament. A column published Thursday suggests that all could change at a most inopportune time for the administration, as it prepares to release its second surge-related progress report next month.

“Powell is the White House’s ticking-time-bomb scenario,” Sidney Blumenthal writes in Salon. “He was Petraeus before Petraeus, the good soldier before the good soldier, window-dressing before window-dressing. The White House aides’ fear of Powell reflects their guilt, if not their stricken consciences, over his disposal. Powell was used, ruined and tossed overboard. His warnings were ignored, his loyalty was abused, and when he no longer served Bush’s purposes he was unceremoniously discarded.”
Read More

Wabbit Feet

(UK asks U.S. to free residents from Guantanamo) Britain asked the United States to release five British residents from Guantanamo Bay on Tuesday in what analysts saw as a sign that new Prime Minister Gordon Brown is taking a more independent stance from Washington.

(The Black Sites – A rare look inside the C.I.A.’s secret interrogation programThe New YorkerExcerpts: In March, Mariane Pearl, the widow of the murdered Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, received a phone call from Alberto Gonzales, the Attorney General. At the time, Gonzales’s role in the controversial dismissal of eight United States Attorneys had just been exposed, and the story was becoming a scandal in Washington. Gonzales informed Pearl that the Justice Department was about to announce some good news: a terrorist in U.S. custody—Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the Al Qaeda leader who was the primary architect of the September 11th attacks—had confessed to killing her husband. (Pearl was abducted and beheaded five and a half years ago in Pakistan, by unidentified Islamic militants.)

FuddThe Administration planned to release a transcript in which Mohammed boasted, “I decapitated with my blessed right hand the head of the American Jew Daniel Pearl in the city of Karachi, Pakistan. For those who would like to confirm, there are pictures of me on the Internet holding his head.”Pearl was taken aback. In 2003, she had received a call from Condoleezza Rice, who was then President Bush’s national-security adviser, informing her of the same news. But Rice’s revelation had been secret. Gonzales’s announcement seemed like a publicity stunt. Pearl asked him if he had proof that Mohammed’s confession was truthful; Gonzales claimed to have corroborating evidence but wouldn’t share it. “It’s not enough for officials to call me and say they believe it,” Pearl said. “You need evidence.” (Gonzales did not respond to requests for comment.)

Special Agent Randall Bennett, the head of security for the U.S. consulate in Karachi when Pearl was killed—and whose lead role investigating the murder was featured in the recent film “A Mighty Heart”—said that he has interviewed all the convicted accomplices who are now in custody in Pakistan, and that none of them named Mohammed as playing a role. “K.S.M.’s name never came up,” he said. Robert Baer, a former C.I.A. officer, said, “My old colleagues say with one-hundred-per-cent certainty that it was not K.S.M. who killed Pearl.” A government official involved in the case said, “The fear is that K.S.M. is covering up for others, and that these people will be released.” And Judea Pearl, Daniel’s father, said, “Something is fishy. There are a lot of unanswered questions. K.S.M. can say he killed Jesus—he has nothing to lose.” Colonel Dwight Sullivan, the top defense lawyer at the Pentagon’s Office of Military Commissions, which is expected eventually to try Mohammed for war crimes, called his serial confessions “a textbook example of why we shouldn’t allow coercive methods.”

Patriots Who Love the Troops to Death

(FRANK RICH) …As is becoming clearer than ever in this Korffian endgame, hiding behind the troops is the last refuge of this war’s sponsors. This too is a rewrite of history. It has been the war’s champions who have more often dishonored the troops than the war’s opponents. Mr. Bush created the template by doing everything possible to keep the sacrifice of American armed forces in Iraq off-camera, forbidding photos of coffins and skipping military funerals. That set the stage for the ensuing demonization of Ted Koppel, whose decision to salute the fallen by reading a list of their names in the spotlight of “Nightline” was branded unpatriotic by the right’s vigilantes.

The same playbook was followed by the war’s champions when a soldier confronted Donald Rumsfeld about the woeful shortage of armor during a town-hall meeting in Kuwait in December 2004. Rather than campaign for the armor the troops so desperately needed, the right attacked the questioner for what Rush Limbaugh called his “near insubordination.” When The Washington Post some two years later exposed the indignities visited upon the grievously injured troops at Walter Reed Medical Center, The Weekly Standard and the equally hawkish Wall Street Journal editorial page took three weeks to notice, with The Standard giving the story all of two sentences. Protecting the White House from scandal, not the troops from squalor, was the higher priority.

One person who has had enough of this hypocrisy is the war critic Andrew J. Bacevich, a Boston University professor of international relations who is also a Vietnam veteran, a product of the United States Military Academy and a former teacher at West Point. After his 27-year-old son was killed in May while serving in Iraq, he said that Americans should not believe Memorial Day orators who talk about how priceless the troops’ lives are. “I know what value the U.S. government assigns to a soldier’s life,” Professor Bacevich wrote in The Washington Post. “I’ve been handed the check.” The amount, he said, was “roughly what the Yankees will pay Roger Clemens per inning.”…

Ready To Trust General Patraeus?

UPDATE: State Dep’t Ends Baghdad Electricity Updates

President Bush 6/15/2006: “I do think we’ll be able to measure progress. You can measure progress in capacity of Iraqi units, you can measure progress in megawatts of electricity delivered, you can measure progress in terms of oil sold on the market on behalf of the Iraqi people.”

Electricity in Baghdad

Chart Source

Marine Corps Time 7/27/07: “A key aide says Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s relations with U.S. commander Gen. David Petraeus are so poor the Iraqi leader may ask Washington the withdraw the well-regarded U.S. military leader from duty here. The Iraqi foreign minister calls the relationship “difficult.”…Al-Maliki has spoken sharply — not of Petraeus or Crocker personally — but about their tactic of welcoming Sunni militants into the fight against al-Qaida forces in Anbar and Diyalah provinces.”

baghdad

7/24/2007: “Most of the bodies found by the police — an average of 20 a day — are bound, blindfolded and shot execution style, victims of sectarian violence carried out by both Sunni and Shi’ite death squads. Many also bear signs of torture or mutilation, according to medical sources in Baghdad. Despite official Iraqi and U.S. statements to the contrary, the reports indicate that the number of unidentified bodies in the capital has risen again to pre-surge levels over the last two months.”

Good Eats

halloween 95TPMmuckraker features some top-notch analysis concerning Gonzo and the NSA wiretapping program(s?): “There’s a lot of evidence to suggest that Gonzales’s careful, repeated phrasing to the Senate that he will only discuss the program that “the president described” was deliberate, part of a concerted administration-wide strategy to conceal from the public the very broad scope of that initial program…”

Harpers reporting on Blackwater: “…In court papers, Blackwater states that the lawsuit from the four families “unconstitutionally intrudes on the exclusive authority of the military of the federal government to conduct military operations abroad.” Blackwater’s attempt to shield itself behind the military is interesting, as the aftermath of the killings highlighted a huge difference between contractors and the military. Had an officer sent four lightly armed soldiers into Fallujah, he would likely have faced public scrutiny in the military justice system. …”

Classic Clip – Samantha Bee interviews Frank Luntz

Construction of US Embassy in Iraq

Two foremen on the project tell a House committee about how the USA goes about building something like this under Bush/Cheney.  Rory Mayberry, a former subcontractor employee for First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting Company, gives opening testimony:

John Owens, a former employee of First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting Company, gives opening testimony:

Blackwater = Border Patrol?

7/25/2007: “Guard’s Border Mission to be Halved” — The number of National Guard troops along the Arizona-Mexico border will be trimmed in half by the end of next month. As the presidentially mandated Operation Jumpstart mission begins its second year in support of the U.S. Border Patrol, the number of troops is being reduced as planned. It will be trimmed from 6,000 to 3,000 nationally and from 2,400 to 1,200 in Arizona, said National Guard Capt. Kristine Munn. The pullout began July 1 and is scheduled to be completed by Sept. 1.

Hired Guns at the Border? The Contracting Has Begun: I take it that a private contracting company, DynCorp International of Virginia, is sending out press releases (basically advertising itself) hoping to be hired by Homeland Security in this border region. It is offering ‘to train and deploy 1,000 private agents to the U.S.-Mexican border within 13 months, offering a quick surge of law enforcement officers to a region struggling to clamp down on illegal immigration.’

It’s starting to look like that movie we’ve already seen too many times during the Bush/Cheney regime. A caller to the Ed Schultz show named “Captain Bob”, former USMC officer, informs us that a fellow jarhead he’s friends with is working for Blackwater, and that Homeland Security is currently working on a contract negotiation with them to patrol the US-Mexico border. They’re (right at this very moment) arranging for Blackwater personnel to be deputized! Where did this money come from?

7/26/2007: “Senate Passes $3 Billion For Border Patrol” — The money approved Thursday would go toward seizing “operational control” over the U.S.-Mexico border by using additional Border Patrol agents, vehicle barriers, border fencing and observation towers. In addition, there is Cornyn’s effort against people who overstay their visas. Graham said the $3 billion would pay for “more boots on the ground, more people patrolling our border making it harder for somebody to come across illegally. We should have done this a long time ago.” The deal, approved by an 89-1 vote, resurrects a GOP plan to pass some of the most popular parts of Bush’s failed immigration bill. That includes money for additional Border Patrol agents and fencing along the southern border.

Was this the plan all along? Starve the beast until the clamor for border security grew loud enough that they could justify outsourcing it? Let’s check the archives:

2/9/2005: “Bush budget scraps 9,790 border patrol agents” — President uses law’s escape clause to drop funding for new homeland security force — Officially approved by Bush on Dec. 17 after extensive bickering in Congress, the National Intelligence Reform Act included the requirement to add 10,000 border patrol agents in the five years beginning with 2006. Roughly 80 percent of the agents were to patrol the southern U.S. border from Texas to California, along which thousands of people cross into the United States illegally every year.

But Bush’s proposed 2006 budget, revealed Monday, funds only 210 new border agents. The shrunken increase reflects the lack of money for an army of border guards and the capacity to train them, officials said. Retired Adm. James Loy, acting head of the Department of Homeland Security until nominee Michael Chertoff takes over, said funding only 210 new agents was a “recognition that we need to balance those things as we go on down the road with other priorities.” The White House referred questions about the border agents to the Homeland Security Department.

Lies

Life During Wartime

Justice at Stake: Ensuring That Prisoners in the U.S. Are Never ‘Disappeared’- by Shahid Buttar, posted at The Peace Tree

Hadrian’s Forum: “The American founding fathers were well versed in Roman history. People such as Washington, Madison and Jefferson, were all very aware of the evils done by Sulla. When they designed the constitution, and ensured a separation of powers, they were specifically thinking about how they would prevent the rise of an American Sulla.”

Senate Delaying Tactics

Paul Krugman: All the President’s Enablers – by Paul Krugman, posted at Welcome to Pottersville

“I don’t know why the op-ed article that General Petraeus published in The Washington Post on Sept. 26, 2004, hasn’t gotten more attention. After all, it puts to rest any notion that the general stands above politics: I don’t think it’s standard practice for serving military officers to publish opinion pieces that are strikingly helpful to an incumbent, six weeks before a national election. In the article, General Petraeus told us that “Iraqi leaders are stepping forward, leading their country and their security forces courageously.” And those security forces were doing just fine: their leaders “are displaying courage and resilience” and “momentum has gathered in recent months.”In other words, General Petraeus, without saying anything falsifiable, conveyed the totally misleading impression, highly convenient for his political masters, that victory was just around the corner. And the best guess has to be that he’ll do the same thing three years later.”

Exec pleads guilty in Iraq contractor bribery scheme – As the New York Times reports in its Saturday edition, at least eight people connected to former Halliburton subsidiary KBR (formerly Kellogg, Brown and Root), so far receiving $20 billion for war-related services, have been implicated in an investigation into kickbacks and bribes stemming from a scheme to overcharge for freight services to Iraq. Kevin Andre Smoot, managing director for KBR subcontractor Eagle Global Logistics Incorporated, pleaded guilty to dispensing the bribes along with lying to investigators.

Bad Behavior has blocked 2450 access attempts in the last 7 days.